Legal Opinion

Tafti v. County of Tulare

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 24, 2011No. F060098PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*893Opinion

KANE, J.

Farshad A. Tafti (appellant), an individual doing business as Kaweah General Store, appeals from a judgment denying his petition for a writ of mandate in which he challenged the validity of $1,148,200 in civil penalties imposed against him by the County of Tulare and Tulare County division of environmental health services (collectively referred to as respondent). The civil penalties were imposed following an administrative hearing before an administrative law judge (ALJ), whose findings were adopted by respondent, and were based on alleged violations by appellant of laws…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Clark v. City of Hermosa BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
  3. Rodriguez v. SolisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Cadilla v. Board of Medical ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  5. Margarito v. State Athletic CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fettgather v. Bd. of Psychology, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  2. (HC) Iturralde v. AtchleyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
  3. Fettgather v. Board of PsychologyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. Kerman Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  5. Lent v. Cal. Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API