Legal Opinion
Kerman Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 24, 2023No. F083940Published
1Opinion of the Court
Filed 8/7/23 Certified for Publication 8/24/23 (order attached) IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT KERMAN TELEPHONE CO., et al., F083940 Petitioners, (CPUC Decision Nos. 19-12-041 & v. 22-01-018) PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, OPINION Respondent; PUBLIC ADVOCATES OFFICE AT THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION, Real Party in Interest. ORIGINAL PROCEEDINGS; petition for writ of review. BRB Law, Patrick M. Rosvall and Sarah J. Banola, for Petitioners. Christine Hammond, Dale Holzschuh, and Carrie G. Pratt for Respondent. No appearance for Real Party in Interest.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- General Electric Company v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Trinity Broadcasting of Florida, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- Ponderosa Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Tafti v. County of TulareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011