Legal Opinion

Fettgather v. Bd. of Psychology

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided November 21, 2017No. C074166PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHull, J.

*1342Appellant Dr. Robert P. Fettgather (Fettgather) appeals from an order of the trial court denying his petition for writ of administrative mandamus. His petition challenges the revocation of his license to practice psychology by Respondent California Board of Psychology (the Board). The trial court denied Fettgather's petition on the ground that the only relevant inquiry before the Board was whether Fettgather failed to comply with an order for an examination under Business and Professions Code section 820 ; undesignated section references will be to this code. Further, the trial court found…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. Morton Salt Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Conn v. GabbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Arnett v. Dal CieloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Conklin v. Oregon Medical BoardDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
  2. Yang v. Board of Registered Nursing CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API