Legal Opinion
In re Dean
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 11, 1998No. SC 15785PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The respondent, Superior Court Judge Harold H. Dean, appeals from the decision of the judicial review council (review council) to censure him publicly for wilfully and intentionally failing to pay a $250 weekly instalment order issued by a Superior Court judge pursuant to General Statutes § 52-356d. The review council is authorized pursuant to General Statutes § 51-5 In (a) (l),1 to censure a judge of the Superior Court publicly *185for a “wilful violation of . . . any canon of judicial ethics” as set forth in General Statutes § 51-51i (a) (2).2 *186The review council had initiated an…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Geiler v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- In Re Hon. Charles E. KadingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. DashSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Kinney v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Vaillancourt v. New Britain Machine/LittonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re the Disciplinary Proceeding Against TurcoWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Interlude, Inc. v. SkuratSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- In Re TurcoWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Pease v. Charlotte Hungerford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Judicial Inquiry & Review Comm'n of Va. v. PomrenkeSupreme Court of Virginia · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.