Pease v. Charlotte Hungerford Hospital
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtVertefeuille, J.
The dispositive question presented by this appeal is whether a prevailing party in a civil action can enforce an unpaid award of costs through a motion for civil contempt rather than by pursuing the various postjudgment remedies authorized by chapter 906 of the General Statutes. We conclude that, under ordinary circumstances, such as those in this case, the court's inherent contempt power is not an appropriate means of enforcing an award of costs or other monetary judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court denying the motion of the named defendant, The Charlotte Hungerford…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- AvalonBay Communities, Inc. v. Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Luurtsema v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- Ahneman v. AhnemanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Clement v. ClementConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Krausman v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2020
- Cohen v. Dept. of Energy & Environmental ProtectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
- Cokic v. Fiore Powersports, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2026
- Estate of Gilbert Dominguez v. Estes Express Lines, Inc. and G.I. Trucking Company, dba Estes WestDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2026
- McCarter and English LLP v. Jarrow Formulas, IncDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.