Legal Opinion

Saldana v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1993No. 90-24PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Justice.

The foremost question presented in this case arises out of the claim of Maro Salda-na (Saldana) that the State unlawfully invaded his reasonable expectation of privacy with respect to telephone company records for an unlisted telephone number. His specific contention is that certain records concerning telephone calls made to, and from, his unlisted telephone number at his residence were seized, or otherwise intercepted, in violation of Wyo. Const, art. 1, § 4 and Wyo.Stat. §§ 7-3-601 to -610 (Supp. 1990) and, because of the violation of the Constitution and statutes, those…

2Cases cited62 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Ker v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. United States v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. O'BOYLE v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Lancaster v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Vasquez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Springfield v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Taul v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API