Legal Opinion

United States v. Freeman

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided April 19, 1989No. NMCM 88 0383PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COUGHLIN, Senior Judge:

The appellant, a private in the Marine Corps, proceeded pro se at a general court-martial before a military judge alone. Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted of one specification of aggravated assault by intentionally inflicting grievous bodily harm, one specification of aggravated assault with a dangerous weapon, one specification of assault consummated by a battery and two specifications of disrespect toward his superior noncommissioned officer, in violation of Articles 128 and 91, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. §§ 928 and 891. The…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. DresenU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
  2. United States v. MixU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991
  3. United States v. StreaterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  4. United States v. MeekU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1994
  5. Freeman v. StuartU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API