Legal Opinion

United States v. Mix

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided May 24, 1991No. ACMR 8800256PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*976OPINION OF THE COURT ON FURTHER REVIEW

VARO, Judge:

The appellant was tried by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members. Contrary to his pleas, he was convicted of conspiracy to commit larceny, three specifications of desertion, violation of a general regulation by failing to store arms and ammunition in the arms room, two specifications of escape from confinement, destruction of government property, destruction of private property, larceny, arson, housebreaking, and breaking restriction. His numerous offenses were in violation of Articles 81, 85, 92, 95, 108, 109, 121,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. LopezUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  2. United States v. MixUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  3. United States v. ProctorU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  4. United States v. DresenU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API