Legal Opinion

United States v. Meek

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided July 21, 1994No. NMCM 91 02664PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, Chief Judge:

Pursuant to his pleas, the appellant was convicted at special court-martial, military judge sitting alone, of unauthorized use of a government vehicle and multiple larcenies, in violation of Articles 92 and 121, respectively, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. §§ 892, 921. On appeal, in a summary assignment of error, he claims that the military judge erred by failing to dismiss the charges against him because of misconduct by the original trial counsel.1 Although we find instances of over-reaching and inappropriate behavior by the trial counsel (TC), as…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. United States v. Adam David HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. MitchellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  4. United States v. JonesU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990
  5. United States v. StroupUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. MeekCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API