Legal Opinion

United States v. Dresen

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided March 22, 1993No. ACM 29249PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SNYDER, Judge:

Is an accused denied his Sixth Amendment right to counsel when the trial judge denies a request for a continuance and informs the accused he must either proceed with duly detailed and individual military counsel or proceed pro se? Under the facts and circumstances of the instant case, we hold he is not.

Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted by a general court-martial, which included enlisted members, of willful disobedience of a superior commissioned officer and divers uses of marijuana.1 He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Lockhart v. FretwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Morris v. SlappySupreme Court of the United States · 1983

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. DresenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  2. United States v. GrantU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
  3. United States v. BlaneyUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
  4. United States v. DresenCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  5. United States v. LaneUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API