Legal Opinion

Rosenfield v. Swenson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 5, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action brought in the municipal court of Minneapolis, to recover $218.25, for two barrels of whiskey sold and delivered. Appeal by plaintiffs from an order refusing a new trial after trial by the court and judgment ordered for defendants.

1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.

The plaintiffs in this action appeal from an order denying their motion for a new trial. From the findings of fact made by the court, a jury trial having been waived, it appears that plaintiffs were wholesale and the defendants retail dealers in spirituous liquors in the same city, their places of business being but a few blocks apart. It was orally agreed between them that the former should sell and deliver to the latter two barrels — 97 gallons — of a certain kind and quality of whiskey at a stipulated price per gallon, and that if it was not of the kind and quality stipulated, and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. ChesrownSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. Lee v. BangsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stewart v. B. R. Menzel Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  2. Courtesy Flour Co. v. WestbrookSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  3. Laminack v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  4. Potter v. LeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Wirth v. FawkesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API