Legal Opinion
Mibbs, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of Revenue
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided December 6, 1999No. 25024PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice:
Appellant (Mibbs) commenced this action against respondent (Department) to recover for business losses allegedly incurred when cash payouts for video poker were banned in Anderson and Oconee counties pursuant to a November 1994 local option referendum. The trial judge granted Department summary judgment. We affirm.
FACTS
Mibbs operated two convenience stores, one in Oconee County and one in Anderson County. In July 1993, the legislature enacted S.C.Code Ann. § 12-21-2806 which provided for the local option referendum regarding cash payouts to be held in November 1994. Mibbs…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- United States v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Eastern Enterprises v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Connolly v. Pension Benefit Guaranty CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- White v. JM Brown Amusement Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
- Westside Quik Shop, Inc. v. StewartSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
- Murphy v. RossowNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Rick's Amusement, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- James Brady v. City of Myrtle BeachCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.