Legal Opinion

Rick's Amusement, Inc. v. State

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 5, 2001No. 25359PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JUSTICE BURNETT:

Appellants, owners of video gaming machines and operators of commercial establishments providing video gaming machines, appeal the circuit court’s order granting Respondent State of South Carolina’s (the State’s) Rule 12(b)(6), SCRCP, motion to dismiss. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

In July 1993, the legislature enacted South Carolina Code Ann. § 12-21-2806 (2000) (local option law) which permitted counties to hold a referendum to determine whether non-machine cash payouts for -video gaming should become illegal. As a result of the referendum held in November 1994, twelve counties voted…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Holliday Amusement Co. v. South CarolinaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2007
  2. Denene, Inc. v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  3. White v. JM Brown Amusement Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
  4. McQueen v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  5. Anonymous Taxpayer v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API