Legal Opinion

Ulery v. Kitsap County

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1936No. 26253. Department TwoPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

—Motions made by respondents in their brief to strike certain parts of the brief of appellant-are without merit and are denied.

Respondents are the owners of a farm of sixty-two acres on what is known as Lateral Highway No. 2 in Kitsap county and have been in continuous possession since 1928. Twenty acres are on the easterly side and approximately forty acres are on the westerly side of the highway, the farm being the lowest land in a narrow valley.

The original graveled road was constructed in 1914, with a thirty-foot right of way and a width of about fourteen feet, across respondents’ land,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Wong Kee Jun v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Phillips v. PhillipsWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Morton v. HinesWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Whiteside v. Benton CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Boitano v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. King County v. Boeing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Harkoff v. Whatcom CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Lambier v. City of KennewickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  5. Papac v. City of MontesanoWashington Supreme Court · 1956

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API