Legal Opinion
Mozes v. Medtronic, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided June 24, 1998No. CIV. 96-993/RHK/JMMPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KYLE, District Judge.
Introduction
In 1991, Plaintiff Mark Mozes (“Mozes”) received a pacemaker that contained a pacemaker lead manufactured by Defendant Medtronic, Inc. (“Medtronic”). While in Par is in 1994, Mozes required emergency surgery during which the doctors replaced parts of his pacemaker, including the lead. Mozes then filed suit against Medtronic, alleging product liability claims based upon negligence, strict liability, and a failure to warn. Currently before the Court are Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiffs Motion for Partial Summary…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Atwater Creamery Co. v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Bilotta v. Kelley Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kapps v. Biosense Webster, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
- Clark v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
- Teska v. Potlatch Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2002
- Gardner v. Brillion Iron Works, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Markel v. Douglas Technologies Group, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.