Wakefield v. Champlain Marine Co.
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtJeffords, J.
This is an action of contract. Trial was had by the Chittenden Municipal Court without a jury. Judgment was rendered for the defendant and the case is here on plaintiff’s bill of exceptions.
From the findings filed it appears, as far as here material, that one Alderman entered the employ of the defendant in the summer of 1934 at an agreed wage of $35.00 per week. That in October of that year the defendant, through its manager, and Alderman agreed that $5.00 per week should be deducted from his wages during the winter months of 1934-1935 which deductions the defendant promised to repay to him…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Piper v. Oakland Motor Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1920
- Levin v. RouilleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1938
- Hill v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1861
- Powers v. Rutland RailroadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914
- Thompson v. ProutySupreme Court of Vermont · 1854
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sparrow v. CimonettiSupreme Court of Vermont · 1948
- Barrows v. PowellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1943
- City of Montpelier v. DuranleauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1984