Legal Opinion

Sparrow v. Cimonetti

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 4, 1948PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMoulton, C. J.

On October 31, 1946, the parties to this cause entered into a written agreement for the conveyance of certain land in the town of Stamford by the defendants to the plaintiffs. The defendants have refused to execute the required deed, and this proceeding in equity has been brought to obtain specific performance. The answer alleges that the agreement was entered into under a mistake and asks for affirmative relief by way of rescission. After hearing and filing findings of fact the chancellor entered a decree for the plaintiffs. The cause is before us on the defendants’ exceptions to the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Phillips v. PlastridgeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1935
  2. Taylor v. Henderson and SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  3. Domina Ex Rel. Domina v. PrattSupreme Court of Vermont · 1940
  4. Stone v. BriggsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1942
  5. Burlington Building & Loan Ass'n v. CummingsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1941

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Loeb v. LoebSupreme Court of Vermont · 1955
  2. Crawford v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 1966
  3. Jackson v. RogersSupreme Court of Vermont · 1957
  4. Neverett v. TowneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
  5. New England Road MacHinery Co. v. CalkinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1959

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API