Legal Opinion

City of Montpelier v. Duranleau

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 30, 1984No. 83-561PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPeck, J.

The City of Montpelier (plaintiff) instituted this action against the Duranleau Construction Company (defendant) alleging breach of a 1977 construction contract by the latter. After trial by court, judgment was entered for the plaintiff to recover damages in the amount of $1882.60. Defendant filed a timely appeal; we affirm.

Under the terms of the contract, defendant agreed to construct the so-called Dog River Recreation Field owned by the plaintiff. Paragraph 14 of the contract, relied on by plaintiff in its complaint, provided in part: “All work shall be performed in accordance with the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sherwin & Salpaugh v. Rut. & Bur. Rail RoadSupreme Court of Vermont · 1852
  2. Wakefield v. Champlain Marine Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1940

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Giles v. City of New HavenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API