Piper v. Oakland Motor Co.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Action op Contract for breach of warranty in the sale of an automobile. Plea, the general issue. Trial by Court at the April Term, 1919, Windham County, Stanton, J-., presiding. Judgment for the plaintiff. The defendant excepted. The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the CourtPowers, J.
The plaintiff bought an Oakland automobile of K. B. Mosher, a dealer in Brattleboro. Subsequently, a sand hole, due to defective easting, appeared in the cylinder block, and a new one had to be procured and installed in the car. This action of contract predicated upon an alleged broken warranty was brought against Mosher and the defendant company. Afterwards Mosher died, and the suit was discontinued as against him. The trial below was by the court, and judgment was for the plaintiff on findings filed. The defendant brings the case here on exceptions.
[1, 2] The defendant company had no direct…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Giffen v. City of LewistonIdaho Supreme Court · 1898
- Mack v. Drummond Tobacco Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Poirier Manufacturing Co. v. KittsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
- Citizens' Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Crawford v. Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 1966
- McCarty v. King County Medical Service Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1946
- O'BRIEN v. Comstock Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1965
- Hendrickson v. International Harvester Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Vermont · 1927
- New York Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.