Storms v. Schneider
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JOHNSON, Chief Judge.
Each of the two parties to this lawsuit seeks ownership of a particular statue of Our Lady of the Immaculate Conception. Storms commenced a replevin action to recover the statue from Schneider. The district court denied Schneider’s request for a jury trial, conducted a court trial, and decided the case in Storms’s favor. On appeal, Schneider argues only that she is entitled to a jury trial. We conclude that Schneider is so entitled and, therefore, reverse and remand for a new trial.
FACTS
We will recite the facts that are not in dispute and relevant to our resolution…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Abraham v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- Indianhead Truck Line, Inc. v. Hvidsten Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Olson v. Synergistic Technologies Business Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
- Morton Brick & Tile Co. v. SodergrenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
- Seebold v. EustermannSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schmitz v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013
- Michael Jones v. Tom RoyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Blum v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017