Legal Opinion

Michael Jones v. Tom Roy

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided October 7, 2011No. 11-2517UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Michael Jones appeals the district court’s 1 pre-service dismissal with prejudice of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint, in which he alleged that his personal property had been confiscated and retained by the Minnesota Department of Corrections without affording him due process. Upon careful de novo review, this court concludes that dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) was proper. See Moore v. Sims, 200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir.2000) (per curiam) (standard of review).

Specifically, Jones did not state a claim against defendants in their individual capacities because he did not plead facts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Moore v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  4. Swenson v. HolstenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
  5. Storms v. SchneiderCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cartwright v. Minot, City ofDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2024
  2. Parry v. GraysDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
  3. Williams v. KeenDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API