Legal Opinion

Litzen v. Eggert

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1941PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was hied April 15, 1941:

Fritz, J.

On this appeal the appellant, Floyd L. Litzen, contends that the court erred (1) in submitting to the jury the question of assumption of risk as to lookout; (2) in refusing to give plaintiff's requested instruction regarding a guest’s assumption of his host’s negligent lookout; and also ■ (3) in entering judgment dismissing plaintiff’s complaint. On the other hand, the respondents, Alfred’Eggert and his insurer, contend that Litzen’s appeal is improper and must be dismissed; that his remedy if any is by mandamus; that the mandate upon the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mauel v. Wisconsin Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Monahan v. Fairbanks-Morse Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  3. State ex rel. Littig v. Superior Court of Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Tomberlin v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Barlow Seelig Mfg. Co. v. PatchWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. M. & M. Realty Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Gross v. Midwest Speedways, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Cathey v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  4. State Ex Rel. Blackdeer Ex Rel. Blackdeer v. Township of LevisCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
  5. State Ex Rel. Lisbon Town Fire Insurance v. CrosbyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API