Mauel v. Wisconsin Automobile Insurance
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
After the owners of the garage were discharged by the court in the action begun against them as described in the complaint, an execution was issued against Knapp to recover the amount of damages awarded against him; the execution was returned wholly unsatisfied. No appeal was taken from the judgment discharging the owners of the garage, who were the assured under the policy with which we are concerned. This policy states clearly that the assured were protected against liability imposed by law, and that the insurer undertook the payment of any such liability.
The learned trial judge declared…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kruse v. WeigandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Calumet Auto Co. v. DinyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
- State v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
- Marinette, Tomahawk & Western Railroad v. Railroad Commission of WisconsinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
- Lucas v. MuellerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- City of Wauwatosa v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Fullerton Lumber Co. v. TorborgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- Culver v. WebbWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- Hardware Mut. Casualty Co. v. WendlingerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.