Legal Opinion

Cathey v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1964PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.

This is Mr. Cathey’s second appeal to this court, and we are convinced that he is foreclosed as to his principal contentions on this appeal because the judgment on the previous appeal is res judicata. It is necessary that we review the development of this litigation.

Mr. Cathey claims to have been injured on April 2, 1958, while an employee of the defendant Lambrecht Farms. He made an application for compensation, and a hearing was held before an examiner of the Industrial Commission. The examiner’s decision, dated November 3, 1959, was adverse to Mr. Cathey. Mr. Cathey filed a petition for…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Plesko v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Litzen v. EggertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Monahan v. Fairbanks-Morse Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  4. State ex rel. Littig v. Superior Court of Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Lutien v. City of KewauneeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fehrman v. SmirlWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Howard v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. L. INS. CO.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Estate of RadocayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Howard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Liability InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Olson v. Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API