Legal Opinion

Scott v. Meek

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 10, 1955No. 17053PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Legge, Justice.

Answering the complaint in this action for damages arising out of an automobile collision, the defendant, after pleading a general denial and contributory negligence and recklessness, set up a counterclaim for personal injuries and property damage alleged to have been sustained by him as the result of the said collision. Plaintiff moved to strike the counterclaim as sham and frivolous, basing his motion upon the pleadings and an affidavit of Lowry H. Dorris, an adjuster for Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, insurer of plaintiff against liability for death, personal injury…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Archambault v. SprouseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949
  2. Etiwan Fertilizer Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
  3. Baker v. ALLENSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  4. Norton v. Planters Fertilizer & Phosphate Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
  5. Simmons Manufacturing Co. v. Whitton Automotive Parts Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1928

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Keith v. GlennSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Cochran v. BellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  3. Scott v. MeekSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  4. Clifton v. Darlington Finance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  5. Lancaster v. SweatSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API