Baker v. ALLEN
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Oxner, Justice.
This is an action against the County of Dillon and the Probate Judge and Treasurer thereof for money had and received. It is claimed that plaintiff was unlawfully required *145to pay $4.00 for a marriage license, although the proper fee was only $1.00. Recovery is sought for the difference of $3.00. The case is here on appeal from an order striking out, as sham and' irrelevant, the answer of the County of Dillon and ¶ its Treasurer and awarding judgment for the plaintiff on the pléadings.
It is alleged in the complaint that on July 29, 1950, plaintiff and Lenore Cummings,' both…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Railroad Co. v. CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Lamborn v. County CommissionersSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- DeTREVILLE v. GROOVERSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
- Etiwan Fertilizer Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
- Dillon County v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rose v. Vulcan Materials CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Town of Bennettsville v. BledsoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1954
- Scott v. MeekSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
- Vance v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
- Dillon County v. Maryland Cas. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.