Legal Opinion

Lancaster v. Sweat

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 31, 1961No. 17831PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Oxner, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order striking the second defense of defendants’ answer upon the ground that it is irrelevant, immaterial and redundant.

It is alleged in the complaint that defendant Ellen V. Sweat negligently and recklessly drove her automobile into the corner of plaintiff’s residence causing extensive damage to the building and loss of the use of one room for a considerable period of time while necessary repairs were being made. The action was brought to recover the actual damages sustained as a result of said collision, together with punitive damages. For a first…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mason v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  2. Etiwan Fertilizer Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
  3. Lucas v. GarrettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946
  4. Scott v. MeekSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  5. Crook v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sams v. SamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
  2. Bailey v. Lyman Printing and Finishing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  3. White v. ColemanDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1967
  4. Embassy Men's Apparel, Inc. v. Lyman Printing & Finishing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API