Legal Opinion

Archambault v. Sprouse

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 6, 1949No. 16259PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EishburnE, Justice.

This is a suit in equity, brought to enforce compliance with certain restrictions as to buildings, imposed in deeds of the several lots comprising a residential subdivision known as Palmetto Gardens which is located in or near North Charleston.

Plaintiffs and the defendant are resident lot owners of the subdivision. And, for the purposes of this appeal, it may be assumed that the entire development, including the property of all parties to this suit, is subject to certain restrictive covenants limiting the use to which the property may be put, and the number and character of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stewart v. FinkelstoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  2. Snow v. Van DamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Bacon v. SandbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  4. Johnson v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  5. Pitts v. BrownSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Sams v. SamsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966
  2. Papanikolas Bros. Enterprises v. Sugarhouse Shopping Center AssociatesUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Springfield v. Williams Plumbing Supply Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1967
  4. ARCHAMBAULT v. SprouseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951
  5. McDONALD v. WELBORNSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1951

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API