Legal Opinion

People v. Rankin

California Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1937No. Crim. 4116PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.

This cause was taken over after decision in the District Court of Appeal of the Second Appellate District, Division Two, in order that we might more fully examine the record and certain issues raised upon the appeal. An examination of the evidence, covering 1742 pages of the reporter’s transcript, compels us to agree with the conclusion of the Appellate Court that as to the appellants Beggs, Ross and St. John there is a dearth of corroborating evidence within the meaning of section 1111 of the Penal Code as interpreted in People v. Kempley, 205 Cal. 441 [271 Pac. 478], and People v. Davis,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. People v. KempleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Leavens v. Pinkham & McKevittCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Thatch v. LivingstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. Koeberle v. HotchkissCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. CodinaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. People v. MacEwingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. People v. RittgerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. People v. HendersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  5. People v. McNamaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API