Legal Opinion

People v. McNamara

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 24, 1951No. Crim. 2711PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NOURSE, P. J.—

Found guilty, by a jury, of conspiracy to commit forgery, defendant William McNamara appeals from the judgment rendered accordingly and from the orders denying his motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment. Although the latter order is reviewable on the appeal from the judgment the order itself is not appealable and the purported appeal from said order must be dismissed. (People v. Williams, 184 Cal. 590 [194 P. 1019].)

William McNamara together with Henry Rekula and Eileen Rekula, his wife, were charged by one indictment with two counts of forging and passing with…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. People v. GreerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. People v. YeagerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. People v. TrujilloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. People v. RobbinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. People v. BuffumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. People v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  4. People v. BuonoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. People v. GoldsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API