Legal Opinion

MAY v. ELK PIPELINE, INC.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided February 3, 2020No. 1:18-cv-10311Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE : WILLIAM MAY, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil No. 18-10311 (RBK/AMD) : v. : OPINION : ELK PIPELINE, INC., : : Defendant. : : : : : KUGLER, United States District Judge: This matter comes before the Court upon Defendant’s Motion (Doc. 30) to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). For the reasons detailed herein, Defendant’s motion is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND This case stems from a labor dispute. Plaintiffs William May, John Cavallaro, Ryan Bogner, Leroy Henicks, and John Truman (“Plaintiffs”) were…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Santiago v. Warminster TownshipCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API