Legal Opinion
Agster v. Maricopa County
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided March 30, 2007No. CV-02-1686-PHX-JATPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
TEILBORG, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorneys Fees and Non-Taxable Costs (Doc. # 662) and Second Motion for Attorneys Fees (Doc. # 791), Maricopa County and the Maricopa Sheriff Defendants’ Motion to Strike Second Motion for Attorneys Fees (Doc. # 796), and Defendants Maricopa County and Maricopa County Correctional Health’s (MCCH’s) Motion to Strike Second Motion for Attorneys Fees (Doc. # 797). The Court now rules on the motions.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On August 6, 2001, Charles Agster was brought into the Madison Street Jail by City of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
- Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Corral v. Montgomery CountyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
- Roberts v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Stormans Inc. v. SeleckyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2012
- McCollough v. Johnson, Rodenberg & LauingerDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2009
- Dinsbach v. HarrisDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.