Legal Opinion
McCollough v. Johnson, Rodenberg & Lauinger
District Court, D. Montana
Decided July 27, 2009No. CV-07-166-BLG-CSOPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR A NEW TRIAL AND TO AMEND THE JUDGMENT
CAROLYN S. OSTBY, United States Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is Defendant Johnson, Rodenberg & Lauinger’s (“JRL”) motion for a new trial and to alter/amend the judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59. Court’s Doc. No. 186. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will deny JRL’s motion.
I. BACKGROUND
This matter was tried to a jury on April 14, 15, and 16, 2009. The jury returned a verdict in favor of McCollough, finding that JRL violated the Montana Unfair Trade Practices Act (“UTPA”), maliciously prosecuted…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Ciralsky v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Sequa Corp. v. GBJ Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Tony Duckett v. Salvador Godinez Brian McKayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.