Legal Opinion
Roberts v. City of Phoenix
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided July 1, 2010No. 1 CA-CV 09-0283PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BROWN, Judge.
¶ 1 The City of Phoenix (“City”) appeals the trial court’s order striking its answer and the resulting default judgment entered against the City as a sanction for discovery violations. The City also challenges the amounts awarded for damages and attorneys’ fees. Randy E. Roberts cross-appeals from the judgment, asserting the court erred in failing to award the full amounts of the damages and attorneys’ fees he requested. Roberts also challenges the denial of his request to hold the City’s legal counsel jointly liable for attorneys’ fees. For the following reasons, we…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Daou v. HarrisArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Chaney Building Co. v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- McGinnis v. Kentucky Fried Chicken of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Estate of Lewis v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
- Newman v. Select Specialty Hospital-Arizona, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Kaufman v. JesserDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2012
- Walsh v. Advanced Cardiac Specialists CharteredCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Aubuchon v. MaricopaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.