Legal Opinion
Comcast of Oregon II, Inc. v. City of Eugene
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided June 11, 2009No. CC 16-03-07308; CA A126445; SC S054884PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.
In this action, Comcast of Oregon II, Inc. (Comcast) challenges the validity of two administrative orders that the city manager of the City of Eugene (city) adopted. The trial court granted summary judgment for the city. On appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed and remanded. Comcast of Oregon II, Inc. v. City of Eugene, 211 Or App 573, 155 P3d 99 (2007). The Court of Appeals determined, among other things, that ORS 30.275, which we quote below, did not obligate Comcast to give a timely notice of its claims to the city before filing this action. This court granted review to address that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Planned Parenthood Ass'n v. Department of Human ResourcesOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Hale v. Port of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Krieger v. JustOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Urban Renewal Agency v. LackeyOregon Supreme Court · 1976
- Owens v. MaassOregon Supreme Court · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Oregon Occupational Safety & Health Division v. CBI Services, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2014
- Curzi v. Oregon State LotteryCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- Doyle v. City of MedfordCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- E. J. T. v. Jefferson CountyOregon Supreme Court · 2022
- City of Eugene v. Comcast of Oregon II, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.