Legal Opinion

People v. Brinson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1991PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that County Court erred in denying his motion to suppress property seized from his motel room pursuant to a search warrant because the issuing Magistrate failed to have the oral warrant application transcribed and to certify to the accuracy of the transcription *1020as required by CPL 690.36 (3). Although there was technical noncompliance with the requirements of that statute, we conclude that reversal is not required where, as here, the issuing Magistrate filed the original audiotape within 24 hours of issuance of the warrant, thereby…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. TuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. People v. MartinNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. CrandallNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. People v. CrandallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. People v. DanceyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. ToellnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. People v. SandersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. People v. BonillaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  4. People v. MageeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. People v. ChambersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API