People v. Tutt
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
We reach our conclusion on a very narrow ground. We do not suggest that at the time defendant made the statement and surrendered the car keys, both of which are sought to be suppressed, he then waived any aspect of the full preinterrogation admonitions to which he was constitutionally entitled (Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436). We agree with the dissenters that the record here would not support any such finding. Rather, we conclude that there should be an affirmance because of the failure of defendant at the suppression hearing…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. Rodney P.(Anonymous)New York Court of Appeals · 1967
3Cited by213 opinions
- People v. De BourNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. UdzinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. PavaoNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. ThomasNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- People v. MartinNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
208 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.