Legal Opinion

People v. Martin

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 3, 1980PublishedCited by 184 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

It is defendant’s contention that, although the police may have had probable cause to arrest him, they acted improperly when they entered his home for that purpose without first obtaining an arrest warrant (Payton v New York, 445 US 573). Consequently, defendant argues, the evidence obtained as a result of the entry should have been suppressed. During his suppression hearing, however, defendant argued only that the physical evidence seized in conjunction with his arrest should be excluded because it was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. People v. De BourNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. People v. TuttNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. People v. MichaelNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. People v. PaytonNew York Court of Appeals · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by184 opinions

  1. People v. UdzinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. People v. PavaoNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. People v. JonesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. People v. GonzalezNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. People v. ShabazzNew York Court of Appeals · 2003

179 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API