Legal Opinion

Van Wert National Bank v. Roos

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1938No. 26974PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

The questions here presented are, first, whether the construction or improvement of a joint county ditch is a public improvement at public expense when about 98% of the cost thereof is assessed against property benefited thereby; second, whether a general assignment by a contractor of the proceeds of a public improvement contract, without the knowledge or consent of the surety, constitutes a material alteration of the contract, thereby discharging the surety from its obligations under its bond.

Defendant contends that the provisions of Section 2365-1 et seq., General Code, requiring a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Southern Surety Co. v. SchlesingerOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Board of Commissioners v. DeitschOhio Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Southern Surety Co. v. ChambersOhio Supreme Court · 1926
  4. American Guaranty Co. v. Cincinnati Iron & Steel Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1927
  5. American Guaranty Co. v. Cliff Wood Coal & Supply Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hochevar v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
  2. Cusack v. McGrainOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  3. City of Medina v. HoldridgeOhio Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API