Van Wert National Bank v. Roos
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.
The questions here presented are, first, whether the construction or improvement of a joint county ditch is a public improvement at public expense when about 98% of the cost thereof is assessed against property benefited thereby; second, whether a general assignment by a contractor of the proceeds of a public improvement contract, without the knowledge or consent of the surety, constitutes a material alteration of the contract, thereby discharging the surety from its obligations under its bond.
Defendant contends that the provisions of Section 2365-1 et seq., General Code, requiring a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Southern Surety Co. v. SchlesingerOhio Supreme Court · 1926
- Board of Commissioners v. DeitschOhio Supreme Court · 1916
- Southern Surety Co. v. ChambersOhio Supreme Court · 1926
- American Guaranty Co. v. Cincinnati Iron & Steel Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1927
- American Guaranty Co. v. Cliff Wood Coal & Supply Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hochevar v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
- Cusack v. McGrainOhio Supreme Court · 1939
- City of Medina v. HoldridgeOhio Court of Appeals · 1970