Legal Opinion
Southern Surety Co. v. Chambers
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 14, 1926No. 19656PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
The bond upon which the action was predicated was the only bond given by the Complete Construction Company to the board of education. It was given in connection with the contract for the erection of the school building in question, to which contract it expressly referred. It was in exactly the statutory amount prescribed in Section. 2365-1, and, although it did not comply in other respects with the statute, it was evidently given in pursuance of the statute. American Guaranty Co. v. Cliff Wood Coal & Supply Co., post 524.
The bond did not conform to the provisions of Sections 2365-1 to 2365-4,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Lorando v. GethroMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- National Union Fire Insurance v. WanbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Duke v. National Surety Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1924
- Fogarty v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
- Southern Surety Co. v. KleinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- American Guaranty Co. v. Cincinnati Iron & Steel Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1927
- American Guaranty Co. v. Cliff Wood Coal & Supply Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926
- Cusack v. McGrainOhio Supreme Court · 1939
- City of Cleveland v. East Ohio Gas Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1929
- Manhattan Terrazzo Brass Strip Co. v. A. Benzing & SonsOhio Court of Appeals · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.