Hochevar v. Maryland Casualty Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ARANT, Circuit Judge.
The Commissioners of Belmont County, Ohio, entered into a written contract with the Burd Construction Company on June 20, 1928, for the grading and paving of a section of county road by November 1, 1929. The County was to retain fifteen per cent of monthly estimates until completion of the work. Appellee executed a bond, conditioned to be void upon performance of the contract and payment by the Burd Company of “all lawful claims of subcontractors, ma-terialmen, and laborers for labor performed and materials furnished in the carrying forward, performing or completing of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Von Hoffman v. City of QuincySupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- State Ex Rel. Southern Surety Co. v. SchlesingerOhio Supreme Court · 1926
- Royal Indemnity Co. v. Day & Maddock Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926
- Fort Worth Independent School Dist. v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
- Claiborne Parish Sch. Bd. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1930
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- National Surety Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Harold Ruth v. Bituminous Casualty CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- Minidoka County Ex Rel. Detweiler Bros. v. KriegerIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
- Graybar Electric Co. v. Manufacturers Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
- American Casualty Company v. Town of Shattuck, Okl.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.