Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Southern Surety Co. v. Schlesinger
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 16, 1926No. 19346PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.
Sections 2365-1 and 2365-2, General Code, require that the surety bond shall contain “an additional obligation for the payment by the contractor, and by all subcontractors, for all labor performed or materials furnished in the construction, erection, alteration or repair of such building, works or improvements.” The condition in the bond fully complies with the statutory requirement. The bank loaned money in good faith to the contractor upon a pledge of the amount due and to become due under the contract, and the money was used by the contractor in paying for labor; and materials which…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Henningsen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Hess & Skinner Engineering Co. v. TurneyTexas Supreme Court · 1919
- Hardaway v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- First Nat. Bank of Seattle v. City Trust, Safe Deposit & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Farmers' Bank v. HayesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
- Lacy v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
- Canton Exchange Bank v. Yazoo CountyMississippi Supreme Court · 1926
- Levinson v. LindermanWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- Standard Acc. Ins. Co. of Detroit v. Federal Nat. Bank of ShawneeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.