Legal Opinion

Hale v. Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama, LLC

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided January 6, 2012No. 2100991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, Judge.

In 2006, Quentin Lamar Hale was employed by Hyundai Motor Manufacturing Alabama, LLC (“HMMA”), in the painting department. When Hale became employed by HMMA, he was provided an *1017employee handbook, which outlined HMMA’s policies on various employment-related issues, including attendance and bereavement leave. Hale acknowledges receipt of the handbook.

The attendance policy reads, in pertinent part:

“Regular attendance is the cornerstone for the success of HMMA, a Team Member’s absenteeism can reduce the quality and effect of the overall efficiency of HMMA’s operations, as well as…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Lee v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  3. Nationwide Prop. & Cas. Ins. Co. v. DPF ARCHITECTSSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  4. Culbreth v. Woodham Plumbing Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  5. Fuqua v. INGERSOLL-RAND CO., INC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Select Specialty Hospitals, Inc. v. Alabama State Health Planning & Development AgencyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  2. Green v. Mobis Alabama, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2014
  3. Rudy v. Walter Coke, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API