Legal Opinion
Rudy v. Walter Coke, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided May 19, 2014No. Case No. 2:12-cv-00696-JEOPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN E. OTT, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Ed Rudy brings this action asserting that Defendants Walter Coke, Inc., (‘Walter Coke”) and Walter Energy, Inc., (“Walter Energy”) terminated his employment to prevent him from using his health benefits for necessary surgery and in retaliation for using his leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (“FMLA”). The defendants have filed a motion for summary judgment as to both claims. (Doc. 19).1 The court conducted oral argument on May 12, 2014. Upon consideration, the court2 finds that the motion is due to be…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Delise diaz v. Autozoners, LLC, D/B/A AutozoneMissouri Court of Appeals · 2015
- Carico v. UPS Ground Freight, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2021
- Tameka Fitzpatrick v. City of BirminghamDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2026