Legal Opinion

Fuqua v. INGERSOLL-RAND CO., INC.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 20, 1991No. 1901302PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The issue presented in this case is whether the trial court erred in entering a summary judgment for the defendant, Ingersoll-Rand Company against the plaintiff, Ernest Fuqua, Jr., an employee of the 3M Company, who was injured by an allegedly defective chain hoist. After a careful review of the evidence submitted, we find that Ingersoll-Rand failed to meet its initial burden of showing a complete absence of any genuine issue of material fact. Accordingly, we must reverse and remand.

Fuqua was an employee of 3M Company, in its Decatur, Alabama, plant. Fuqua's job at the time in question was to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Casrell v. Altec Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  4. Atkins v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  5. Tolbert v. GulsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Ex Parte RizkSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  2. Ex Parte TurnerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  3. Teplick v. MoultonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
  4. Ex Parte HaylesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  5. Ex parte HarrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 2016

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API