Legal Opinion

Lee v. City of Gadsden

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 24, 1992No. 1901468PublishedCited by 167 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The issue presented by this case is whether the trial court erred in entering a summary judgment for the defendant, the City of Gadsden ("the City"), against the plaintiff, Larry Joe Lee, in a breach of contract action based on an alleged implied employment contract for a specified term.

After a careful review of the record, we are convinced that Lee failed to meet his burden of showing that his employment contract was other than one terminable at will. The judgment of the trial court is, therefore, due to be affirmed.

In January 1985, Lee was hired by the City as an "Equipment Operator I"1 for…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. West v. Founders Life Assur. Co. of FloridaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Hanners v. Balfour Guthrie, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Hoffman-La Roche, Inc. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1987
  4. Tolbert v. GulsbySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  5. Fincher v. Robinson Bros. Lincoln-MercurySupreme Court of Alabama · 1991

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by167 opinions

  1. Gray v. Liberty Nat. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. King v. Colbert CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Rhodes v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. Coleman v. BAC ServicingCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  5. Edwards v. Intergraph Services Co., Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008

162 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API