Legal Opinion
Detroit Police Officers Ass'n v. Young
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided June 10, 1991No. Civ. A. 74-71838, 75-71376PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ JOINT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GADOLA, District Judge.
This action has been remanded to this court by the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. The sole issue before this court is whether the voluntary affirmative action plan used by the Detroit Police Department to promote patrol officers to the rank of sergeant is “reasonable,” and thereby, narrowly tailored to meet the compelling interest of the Department of eliminating the effects of past discrimination against blacks.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Wygant v. Jackson Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Middleton v. City of FlintCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Middleton v. City of Flint, MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Detroit Police Officers Ass'n v. YoungDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1995
- Middleton v. City of FlintDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1993
- Detroit Police Officers Ass'n v. YoungDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1994