Legal Opinion
Detroit Police Officers Ass'n v. Young
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided March 31, 1994No. Nos. 74-CV-71838-DT, 75-CV-71376-DTPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ACCEPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE PEPE’S FEBRUARY 2, 1994 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
GADOLA, District Judge.
The court, pursuant to Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), and LR 72.1(d)(2) (E.D.Mich. Jan. 1, 1992), has reviewed the magistrate judge’s February 2, 1994 report and recommendation as well as plaintiffs’ February 17, 1994 objections, defendants’ March 2, 1994 response, and plaintiffs’ March 18,1994 reply filed thereto. After conducting a de novo review, the court accepts the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation as the court’s findings and…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United States v. W. R. Walters, United States of America v. Two Hundred Sixty-Two FirearmsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Franks v. Bowman Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Detroit Police Officers Ass'n v. YoungDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1995