Legal Opinion

Breslin v. Vornado, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 10, 1983No. Civ. A. 82-0190PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

CLIFFORD SCOTT GREEN, District Judge.

Now before the court is defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c). The question for determination is whether triable issues, sufficient to defeat this motion, exist in plaintiffs’ claims for malicious prosecution and tortious interference with prospective business relations. Because I conclude that plaintiffs have failed to state a claim for malicious prosecution, I will grant judgment for defendant as to that portion of the complaint. However, I conclude that plaintiffs have stated a claim for tortious…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. King v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Adler, Barish, Daniels, Levin & Creskoff v. EpsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Landstrom v. ShaverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Silver, Marc I. v. Mendel, M. Mark, Individually, Murray, Daniel E., Individually, and M. Mark Mendel, LtdCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. Kelly-Springfield Tire Co. v. D'AMBROSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Thomas v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
  5. Blue Line Coal Co., Inc. v. EquibankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API