Legal Opinion

Boykin v. Bennett

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 20, 1961No. 310PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMooRE, J.

It does not affirmatively appear from the allegations of the complaint that plaintiff’s intestate was contributorily negligent as a matter of law. As to his conduct the sole allegation is that “he was riding as a gratuitous passenger” in the automobile owned and operated by defendant Bennett.

There is no allegation from which it affirmatively appears, or is necessarily implied, that plaintiff’s intestate knew, or in the exercise of reasonable care should have known, before the race was underway, that defendants would engage in speed competition. Nor does the complaint show.that he failed to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Brown v. ThayerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. Carney v. DeweesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
  3. Skipper v. CheathamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Deck v. SherlockNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Reader v. OttisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Juhl v. AiringtonTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Stetser v. Tap Pharmaceutical Products, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Gilbert v. BagleyDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1982
  5. Blow v. ShaughnessyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API